Hello,
I know I said I wouldn't group meetings in bulk… but there's a few
meetings which have the following in common:
* Everyone who said they wished to attend is: me, teor, and nickm.¹
* The discussion should be fairly fast.
* We're all (I suspect) already in agreement.
* Every topic has to
Hello,
Let's schedule a proposal discussion for prop#267 "Tor Consensus
Transparency" [0] sometime between 14 - 16 Feb. If you're CCed, it's
because you put your name down on the pad as being interested in this
discussion. If anyone has requests or concerns, or if I forgot to take your
timezone
Hey!
Is anybody willing to mentor me on this project?
On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 4:19 PM, Iain Learmonth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 02/02/18 12:08, Jaskaran Singh wrote:
> > Also, the Metrics team has(?) to come up with a proposal on this IIRC.
> > Until then it would not be considered a valid project?
>
isis agora lovecruft wrote
Fri, 9 Feb 2018 00:08:19 +:
> Hi!
>
> The notes from this meeting are online. [0] Thanks to everyone who attended!
>
> We've decided to have the prop#267 [1] meeting next, then (potentially,
> depending on
> the takeaway from the prop#267 meeting) revise prop#239