Re: [tor-dev] path selection constraints: /16 subnet rule when using bridges

2017-12-19 Thread teor
> On 20 Dec 2017, at 10:00, nusenu wrote: > >>> does the following also apply if a Tor users chooses to use a bridge? >>> - We do not choose more than one router in a given /16 subnet >>> [1] >>> >>> Will tor ensure that the relays are not in the same /16 netblock with the >>> bridge?

Re: [tor-dev] path selection constraints: /16 subnet rule when using bridges

2017-12-19 Thread nusenu
>> does the following also apply if a Tor users chooses to use a bridge? >> >>> - We do not choose more than one router in a given /16 subnet >> [1] >> >> Will tor ensure that the relays are not in the same /16 netblock with the >> bridge? > > Yes, as each node is added to the path, its IPv4

Re: [tor-dev] Bandwidth Authority Progress

2017-12-19 Thread Iain Learmonth
Hi, On 11/12/17 16:04, Mike Perry wrote: > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/2394 > > I am not sure what repo they are in, though. > https://gitweb.torproject.org/metrics-tasks.git/tree/task-2394 Thanks, Iain. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature __

Re: [tor-dev] Bandwidth Authority Progress

2017-12-19 Thread Mike Perry
teor: > > On 20 Dec 2017, at 06:06, meejah wrote: > > >> This project is not quite there yet, and will require some > >> non-trivial engineering time, but it's probably a much easier task > >> compared to peerflow due to the design being more understood and > >> already coded. > > > > I'm

Re: [tor-dev] Did tor-wiki-changes ML break?

2017-12-19 Thread Damian Johnson
> Would it help if we moved this to some other infrastructure? If someone else would like to maintain it then sure. Karsten originally ran it, then I took it over when he shut down his r2e instance since I already run one for my news feeds anyway. ___ to

Re: [tor-dev] Did tor-wiki-changes ML break?

2017-12-19 Thread teor
> On 20 Dec 2017, at 08:03, Damian Johnson wrote: > > Oh! Interesting, just got a dump of r2e emails. Guess it came back on > its own without a router reboot. Neat! Would it help if we moved this to some other infrastructure? T >> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Damian Johnson >> wrote: >

Re: [tor-dev] Did tor-wiki-changes ML break?

2017-12-19 Thread Damian Johnson
Oh! Interesting, just got a dump of r2e emails. Guess it came back on its own without a router reboot. Neat! On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Damian Johnson wrote: > Hi nusenu. Yup, I was just thinking about that. CenturyLink did some > work on my apartment's connection yesterday that knocked i

Re: [tor-dev] Bandwidth Authority Progress

2017-12-19 Thread teor
On 20 Dec 2017, at 06:06, meejah wrote: >> This project is not quite there yet, and will require some >> non-trivial engineering time, but it's probably a much easier task >> compared to peerflow due to the design being more understood and >> already coded. > > I'm not convinced this part

Re: [tor-dev] Bandwidth Authority Progress

2017-12-19 Thread meejah
George Kadianakis writes: > The "meeting" was impromptu and IRL because we all happened to be at > the same place. There is no next meeting and it's up to us > (Tor/network team) to figure out what are the next steps here. I want to help. Anyone please bug me on IRC for any Python etc help requi

Re: [tor-dev] Did tor-wiki-changes ML break?

2017-12-19 Thread Damian Johnson
Hi nusenu. Yup, I was just thinking about that. CenturyLink did some work on my apartment's connection yesterday that knocked it offline. Probably just needs the router to be rebooted but I'm visiting with family through new years so the r2e instance will be unavailable until then. More annoyingly

[tor-dev] Did tor-wiki-changes ML break?

2017-12-19 Thread nusenu
Hi Damian, it appears to be the case that wiki changes are no longer send to this ML. Could you have a look? https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-wiki-changes thank you! nusenu -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu twitter: @nusenu_ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digi

Re: [tor-dev] path selection constraints: /16 subnet rule when using bridges

2017-12-19 Thread nusenu
Thanks for confirming. -- https://mastodon.social/@nusenu twitter: @nusenu_ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Re: [tor-dev] path selection constraints: /16 subnet rule when using bridges

2017-12-19 Thread teor
> On 20 Dec 2017, at 03:10, nusenu wrote: > > does the following also apply if a Tor users chooses to use a bridge? > >> - We do not choose more than one router in a given /16 subnet > [1] > > Will tor ensure that the relays are not in the same /16 netblock with the > bridge? Yes, as eac

[tor-dev] path selection constraints: /16 subnet rule when using bridges

2017-12-19 Thread nusenu
Hi, does the following also apply if a Tor users chooses to use a bridge? > - We do not choose more than one router in a given /16 subnet [1] Will tor ensure that the relays are not in the same /16 netblock with the bridge? thanks, nusenu [1] https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tre

Re: [tor-dev] Bandwidth Authority Progress

2017-12-19 Thread George Kadianakis
teor writes: > Hi asn, > > Original Subject: Re: [tor-project] Meeting notes, network team meeting, 18 > Dec > >> On 19 Dec 2017, at 07:28, Nick Mathewson wrote: >> >> - Met with David Stainton, Moritz and others. Talked about relay load >>balancing and bandwidth dirauths. People are sad

[tor-dev] Tor and (open) SDN

2017-12-19 Thread neutron
Hello tor developers, I'm neutron a Tor user and operator of some hidden-services. During the next year I will write my master thesis about a software defined network related project. Currently I'm thinking about which research topic I could choose and Tor came up to my mind. I'm interested in