> On 12 Dec 2017, at 09:41, Tom Ritter wrote:
>
> I'm not sure, but I think
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/21377 needed a
> proposal so I tried to write one up.
Thanks Tom!
Proposals are great for new directory authority features, particularly
when we're changing the directo
Hi David (and others interested in IPv6),
We want to add better IPv6 support to Tor relays, clients, and v3 onion
services.
But if we do IPv6 v3 onion services first, the hop before intro and rend points
will know that the circuit is a v3 onion service circuit, because its EXTEND2
cells will hav
I'm not sure, but I think
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/21377 needed a
proposal so I tried to write one up.
-tom
Filename: xxx-expose-bwauth_votes.txt
Title: Have Directory Authorities expose raw bwauth vote documents
Author: Tom Ritter
Created: 11-December-2017
Status: Open
1.
> On 12 Dec 2017, at 07:29, nusenu wrote:
>
> Absolute single relay cw caps do not have that problem and would prevent
> insane cw values like >80.
>
> I'll setup automatic notifications if certain thresholds are reached.
If we can come up with a threshold that would apply for the next 5-1
teor:
> Automatic limits are also a denial of service risk for the entire network.
>
> If we implement them poorly, they could cause a cascade effect that
> pushes clients onto overloaded relays until they go down.
>
> For that reason alone, I'm not convinced this is a good idea.
That is indeed
