Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 284: Hidden Service v3 Control Port

2017-11-09 Thread David Goulet
On 10 Nov (04:06:55), teor wrote: > > > On 10 Nov 2017, at 03:17, Yawning Angel wrote: > > > > On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 10:13:45 -0500 > > David Goulet wrote: > Ok fun! I'll add this. Good catch! And control-spec.txt should be > updated. > > To be consistent then we could ask for

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 284: Hidden Service v3 Control Port

2017-11-09 Thread teor
> On 10 Nov 2017, at 03:17, Yawning Angel wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 10:13:45 -0500 > David Goulet wrote: Ok fun! I'll add this. Good catch! And control-spec.txt should be updated. To be consistent then we could ask for a as well: "ED25519-V3:"

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 284: Hidden Service v3 Control Port

2017-11-09 Thread Yawning Angel
On Thu, 9 Nov 2017 10:13:45 -0500 David Goulet wrote: > > > Ok fun! I'll add this. Good catch! And control-spec.txt should be > > > updated. > > > > > > To be consistent then we could ask for a as well: > > > > > > "ED25519-V3:" > > > > > > ... which contains the ed25519 private key. > >

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 284: Hidden Service v3 Control Port

2017-11-09 Thread David Goulet
On 09 Nov (09:27:15), Yawning Angel wrote: > On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 12:20:15 -0500 > David Goulet wrote: > > > This might need a couple more details; as-is ADD_ONION can take > > > "NEW:BEST" (which should now return a v3 service?) or > > > "NEW:ED25519-V3" for explicitly asking for a V3 key, or > > >

Re: [tor-dev] A ContactInfo specification

2017-11-09 Thread nusenu
> I added your note to Sebastian's ticket about publishing key expiry > information in descriptors. I like Sebastian's idea but I also agree to > your opt-in remark - which means that we will likely not get much data > at all (how many relay operators will opt-in vs. the effort to make that > possi

Re: [tor-dev] A ContactInfo specification

2017-11-09 Thread nusenu
teor: >> - OfflineMasterKey setting (0/1) >> - SigningKeyLifetime >> - Sandbox (0/1) > Yes, these are directly related to relay security, so if they can be linked > to the relay, they should be opt-in. I added your note to Sebastian's ticket about publishing key expiry information in descriptors

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 284: Hidden Service v3 Control Port

2017-11-09 Thread Yawning Angel
On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 12:20:15 -0500 David Goulet wrote: > > This might need a couple more details; as-is ADD_ONION can take > > "NEW:BEST" (which should now return a v3 service?) or > > "NEW:ED25519-V3" for explicitly asking for a V3 key, or > > "ED25519-V3:<56 base32 chars>" for adding an already-e

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 284: Hidden Service v3 Control Port

2017-11-09 Thread teor
On 8 Nov 2017, at 04:20, David Goulet wrote: >>> 3.1.3. ADD_ONION >>> >>> For this command to support version 3, new values are added but the syntax >>> is unchanged: >>> >>> "ADD_ONION" SP KeyType ":" KeyBlob >>> [SP "Flags=" Flag *("," Flag)] >>> 1*(SP