Re: [tor-dev] tor-dev Digest, Vol 82, Issue 8

2017-11-06 Thread Nathan Kettle
iptorID" key is extended to accept 32 base64 characters which > is >the descriptor blinded key used for the index value at the "HsDir". > >Because client authentication is not yet implemented, the "AuthType" > field >is always "NO_AUTH". > > 3

[tor-dev] Fwd: Nyx 2.0 Release

2017-11-06 Thread Damian Johnson
Hi tor-dev. Sorry for the cross post but while tor-relays@ is the perfect spot to announce Nyx, tor-dev@ is the traditional place to unveil Stem. I'm pleased to announce Stem 1.6, the accumulation of a full year of improvements for our controller library... https://stem.torproject.org/change_log.

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 284: Hidden Service v3 Control Port

2017-11-06 Thread meejah
David Goulet writes: Hi David, Overall looks good! A few comments inline: > "onions/{current,detached}" >No change. This command can support v3 hidden service without changes >returning v3 address(es). Does the control-spec need a note pointing out that you might get some

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 284: Hidden Service v3 Control Port

2017-11-06 Thread Damian Johnson
Hi David, great proposal! Sorry I'm juggling too many things right now to really really review it. Quick skim though looks great. One quick thought is that the HS_DESC event has an optional positional argument (DescriptorID). This is fine *but* I'd advise against it since it will prevent you from e

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 284: Hidden Service v3 Control Port

2017-11-06 Thread AntiTree
Hey David, Are there any ways of revoking a service's key and should it be included as a control port function? For example, in the case that the master key is kept offline but the host and its descriptor signing key are compromised, the box could be run for a period of time(?) until the keys expi

[tor-dev] Proposal 284: Hidden Service v3 Control Port

2017-11-06 Thread David Goulet
Hi everyone, Attached is the proposal draft for the hidden service v3 contro port specification. The idea with this proposal is to _only_ extend the current commands and events to v3. Nothing new is added. We can think of more things to add after but for now, I wanted a baseline to start with tha

Re: [tor-dev] anonbib

2017-11-06 Thread grarpamp
On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 12:56 AM, ng0 wrote: > I think videos should be a separate issue, we selfhost them > already as far as I know but integrating them into git is > no (good) solution. Don't think I would propose committing the actual videos / papers to git... too much bloat... just the bib /