I wonder if there is an option to start to use ipfs ( https://ipfs.io/ ) or
something like it to permanently and resiliently store items for posterity?
On Nov 4, 2017, at 7:01 PM, grarpamp wrote:
>> With mentioned problems of
>
> - Broken links, not founds, redirects covered by a single month
> With mentioned problems of
- Broken links, not founds, redirects covered by a single monthly
crawl thus being regular and benefitting all projects at once.
- Size, could apply common compression such as xz or even ZSTD
to entire mirrorable local archive. Similar for video materials.
http://open
> Saves a lot of duplicative work at the projects, is easily mirrored,
> imported into web pages, etc.
With mentioned problems of
- Google threat covered by community hosting and replication.
- Separate / overlapping project / topic focus covered by a
flexible tagging and views system.
- Not easi
On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:58:35PM +, ng0 wrote:
>> our plan with the bibliography collection of GNUnet is to
https://gnunet.org/bibliography
>> implement something similar to your/freehaven's anonbib.
https://www.freehaven.net/anonb
Roger Dingledine transcribed 2.5K bytes:
> On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:58:35PM +, ng0 wrote:
> > our plan with the bibliography collection of GNUnet is to
> > implement something similar to your/freehaven's anonbib.
>
> Great.
>
> See also the censorbib, for another example.
Thanks, I'll sear
On 04.11.2017 19:54, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> our plan with the bibliography collection of GNUnet is to
>> implement something similar to your/freehaven's anonbib.
> Great.
> See also the censorbib, for another example.
There's also a mixnet bibliography at https://bib.mixnetworks.org/ /
https:/
On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 09:58:35PM +, ng0 wrote:
> our plan with the bibliography collection of GNUnet is to
> implement something similar to your/freehaven's anonbib.
Great.
See also the censorbib, for another example.
> While running the build and cache update of it from
> current git HEAD
On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:58 PM, ng0 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> our plan with the bibliography collection of GNUnet is to
> implement something similar to your/freehaven's anonbib.
>
> While running the build and cache update of it from
> current git HEAD on the anonbib.cfg I noticed a number of
> outdated