At some time in the past I noticed that the anonbib did
not have links to local copies of some of the materials.
If that's still the case, I'd definitely suggest creating them
at this oppurtunity.
And though rare and more curation work, some papers do
receive content / errata updates.
_
Hi,
our plan with the bibliography collection of GNUnet is to
implement something similar to your/freehaven's anonbib.
While running the build and cache update of it from
current git HEAD on the anonbib.cfg I noticed a number of
outdated and broken links.
I'm currently playing with 2 options: re
On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 05:30:51PM +0300, George Kadianakis wrote:
> That's a great post and thanks for catching all these issues and
> innacuracies! We are definitely interested in consistency and fixing the
> spec (and implementation if needed).
No problem! I'm glad you found my post helpful.
>