Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Move IPv6 ORPorts to the Microdesc Consensus

2017-11-01 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:35 PM, teor wrote: > Hi all, > > We would like to move IPv6 ORPorts from microdescriptors to the > microdesc consensus. This makes it easier for IPv6 clients to bootstrap > and choose reachable guards. > > The proposal is inlined below, it is also available with the cor

Re: [tor-dev] Connection, Channel and Scheduler - An Intense Trek

2017-11-01 Thread Ian Goldberg
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:09:36AM -0400, David Goulet wrote: > On 01 Nov (07:31:50), Ian Goldberg wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:28:03PM +1100, teor wrote: > > > > > > > On 31 Oct 2017, at 06:57, David Goulet wrote: > > > > > > > > * I believe now that we should seriously discuss the rel

Re: [tor-dev] Connection, Channel and Scheduler - An Intense Trek

2017-11-01 Thread David Goulet
On 01 Nov (07:31:50), Ian Goldberg wrote: > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:28:03PM +1100, teor wrote: > > > > > On 31 Oct 2017, at 06:57, David Goulet wrote: > > > > > > * I believe now that we should seriously discuss the relevance of > > > channels. > > > Originally, the idea was good that is pr

Re: [tor-dev] Connection, Channel and Scheduler - An Intense Trek

2017-11-01 Thread David Goulet
On 01 Nov (14:28:03), teor wrote: > > > On 31 Oct 2017, at 06:57, David Goulet wrote: > > > > * I believe now that we should seriously discuss the relevance of channels. > > Originally, the idea was good that is providing an abstraction layer for > > the > > relay to relay handshake and send/

Re: [tor-dev] Connection, Channel and Scheduler - An Intense Trek

2017-11-01 Thread Ian Goldberg
On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 02:28:03PM +1100, teor wrote: > > > On 31 Oct 2017, at 06:57, David Goulet wrote: > > > > * I believe now that we should seriously discuss the relevance of channels. > > Originally, the idea was good that is providing an abstraction layer for > > the > > relay to relay