Hi,
> Hi,
>
> This looks like a great overview of the Shamir secret-sharing
> protocol.
>
> We talked about instantiating it with unsigned 64-bit integers on
> IRC.
> It would be easier for me to understand it (and for someone to code
> it).
>
> This would also help us define an interchange for
On 27 September 2017 at 22:25, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Your survey is obviously massively biased towards users of Tor. It
> would be really interesting to know what non-users think.
Yes and no; I can totally see that from a user-experience perspective, it
would be exciting research to rock up to s
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:25:04PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> On 27 September 2017 at 21:26, Philipp Winter wrote:
> > However, our survey data is likely biased towards a particularly young
> > and educated crowd that's presumably less bothered by technological
> > hurdles, which may be why they c
On 27 September 2017 at 21:26, Philipp Winter wrote:
> However, our survey data is likely biased towards a particularly young
> and educated crowd that's presumably less bothered by technological
> hurdles, which may be why they can afford to care more about content.
Your survey is obviously mass
Interesting.
Do we have a consensus on the length of the "run them in parallel" /
cutover period from old-to-new?
I would be inclined to keep older addresses around for up to 3 years before
trying to kill them entirely, because of such tor-adoption-curve concerns.
NB: this would still be massive
We recently ran a survey on the usability of Tor and onion services [0].
I had a closer look at how our respondents perceive the prop224 domain
format and wanted to share some early insights. The original survey
question was:
> The Tor Project is currently working on the next generation of onion
