> On 20 Sep 2017, at 00:44, George Kadianakis wrote:
>
> Legacy RENDEZVOUS1 cells are bigger than the prop224 ones. The prop224
> spec suggests we pad the new cells so that they look similar in size to
> the legacy ones.
>
> ...
>
> The suggestion is to pad the prop224 cells to 168 bytes using
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 08:29:41PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > Is your goal that someone who sees the *plaintext* of that cell won't be
> > able to tell if it's a legacy RENDEZVOUS1 cell or a new one? If so,
> > life is a bit complicated, since the g^y field will always be in the
> > prime-or
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Ian Goldberg wrote:
> Resending from a subscribed address.
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 05:44:46PM +0300, George Kadianakis wrote:
>> Hello Ian, (and other cryptographers on the list)
>>
>> here is a quick question which you might be able to answer super fast:
>>
>>
Resending from a subscribed address.
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 05:44:46PM +0300, George Kadianakis wrote:
> Hello Ian, (and other cryptographers on the list)
>
> here is a quick question which you might be able to answer super fast:
>
> Legacy RENDEZVOUS1 cells are bigger than the prop224 ones. Th
I emailed someone that runned an out of date version of tor yesterday and maybe
it's more efficient to have an auto mailer to remind ppl to update
On September 19, 2017 2:00:09 PM GMT+02:00,
tor-dev-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:
>Send tor-dev mailing list submissions to
> tor-dev@lis
Hello Ian, (and other cryptographers on the list)
here is a quick question which you might be able to answer super fast:
Legacy RENDEZVOUS1 cells are bigger than the prop224 ones. The prop224
spec suggests we pad the new cells so that they look similar in size to
the legacy ones.
Here is how the
