Hi George,
George Kadianakis wrote:
> Hello s7r,
>
> and thanks for helping with this and approaching it from a different
> direction.
>
> Personally, I'd be really surprised if any solution that statistically
> marks relays or paths as "suspicious" will ever work for this particular
> problem.
Hello Tim,
Thank you very much for the comments. Please see my inline answers as I
think I didn't explain good enough, most of the issues are not actually
a problem.
teor wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> A rendezvous relay is considered suspicious when the number of
>> successfully established circuits in the
