Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable Transports 2.0, draft 1 Specification

2017-03-27 Thread Yawning Angel
On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 04:03:47 -0500 Brandon Wiley wrote: > I am familiar with the dual stack problem generally, where servers > have both IPv4 and IPv6 IP addresses. I was not involved in any > conversations regarding the dual stack problem for Pluggable > Transports specifically. If you could poin

[tor-dev] GSoC 2017 - Questions

2017-03-27 Thread Krishna Shukla
Hey, I'm Krishna Shukla, I'm studying a bachelors of computer science at the University of Queensland. I guess the relevant subjects I've studied so far covers C and Unix programming, Computer Networks, Algorithms and Data Structures, and Programming in the large. (got a high distinction in all

[tor-dev] GSOC 2017: Revised Proposal for anon-connection-wizard

2017-03-27 Thread irykoon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello everyone! I have revised my previous proposal with the help of anonym's feedback. Could anyone offer me some feedback about it please? Any recommendation, suggestion and criticism are very welcome and appreciate d! #What project would you

Re: [tor-dev] GSOC 2017: Proposal for anon-connection-wizard (anonym)

2017-03-27 Thread irykoon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 anonym: > I might be misunderstanding what you and Patrick mean with > "impossible" (or rather, which use cases are impossible) w.r.t. > using Tor Launcher outside of the Tor Browser; Tails uses the Tor > Launcher shipped in Tor Browser, but it'

Re: [tor-dev] Pluggable Transports 2.0, draft 1 Specification

2017-03-27 Thread Brandon Wiley
Thank you for the feedback on the specification draft, Yawning. We will take all of this feedback into account in the next draft. Some specific points are addressed below. On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:27 AM, Yawning Angel wrote: > NB: I'm personally not doing any circumvention related work at all

Re: [tor-dev] Proposition: Applying an AONT to Prop224 addresses?

2017-03-27 Thread Ian Goldberg
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 01:59:42AM -0400, Ian Goldberg wrote: > > To add an aside from a discussion with Teor: the entire "version" field > > could be reduced to a single - probably "zero" - bit, in a manner perhaps > > similar to the distinctions between Class-A, Class-B, Class-C... addresses > >