Re: [tor-dev] Proposing "Post-Quantum safe handshake implementation" as GSoc Project

On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 00:01:29 + isis agora lovecruft wrote: > > The bad news is that, work on it is on going, and it does not make a > > good GSOC project because, the bulk of the implementation work will > > likely happen before the summer. > > It will? Probably? If people take what I say

[tor-dev] txtorcon 'all_routers' issue

As per https://github.com/meejah/txtorcon/issues/203 all released versions of txtorcon that have TorState.all_routers will, upon a NEWCONSENSUS event, make this set empty. There is already a fix on master for the real issue and it will be in the next release. For users of released versions there

Re: [tor-dev] Proposing "Post-Quantum safe handshake implementation" as GSoc Project

Yawning Angel transcribed 3.0K bytes: > On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 14:07:40 +0530 > Jaskaran Singh wrote: > > I'm particularly interested to work on making TOR Handshakes > > Post-Quantum Safe. I feel that this should be implemented at the > > earliest because adversaries could store the network traffic

Re: [tor-dev] List of Tor Exit IP address: Is this available from Tor Control Port

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 03:48:56PM +0100, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) - lists wrote: > is the list of Tor Exit IP addresses available from Tor Control Port or > only from https://check.torproject.org/exit-addresses via TorDNSEL ? The list from check.tp.o is built by active measurement -- it builds a

[tor-dev] List of Tor Exit IP address: Is this available from Tor Control Port

Hi all, is the list of Tor Exit IP addresses available from Tor Control Port or only from https://check.torproject.org/exit-addresses via TorDNSEL ? -naif ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman