> Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2017 20:14:00 -0600
> From: Vi Grey
>
> Wouldn't SHA3 be computational overkill if we're just worrying about the
> checksum making sure the .onion address wasn't mistyped? My suggestion
> would be to use something like this for the checksum:
>
>checksum = HMAC-CRC32(".on
Here is the suggested scheme:
onion_address = base32(version + pubkey + checksum)
checksum = SHA3(".onion checksum" + version + pubkey)
Wouldn't SHA3 be computational overkill if we're just worrying about the
checksum making sure the .onion address wasn't mistyped? My suggestion
would be t
> Not as messy as I thought though:
> $ openssl rsa -in secret_id_key -outform DER -RSAPublicKey_out | sha1
thank you
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.o
