Ah - ok. Alrighty - will seek to find a way to rectify this… thanks for the
quick addressing.
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 12:10 PM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:36 PM, loki der quaeler wrote:
>>
>> Attached is a .tar.gz which has the config.log from the 0.2.8.12 configure
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:36 PM, loki der quaeler wrote:
>
> Attached is a .tar.gz which has the config.log from the 0.2.8.12 configure
> and one from the 0.2.9.9 configure.
Thanks.
Both configure scripts failed to find libevent headers
(event2/event.h, event2/dns.h, event2/bufferevent.h) -- bu
Attached is a .tar.gz which has the config.log from the 0.2.8.12 configure and
one from the 0.2.9.9 configure.
config_logs.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 11:30 AM, Zack Weinberg wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:15 PM, loki der quaeler wrote:
>> Hi -
>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 2:15 PM, loki der quaeler wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Trying to configure 0.2.9.9’s build with this command:
> ./configure --with-libevent-dir=/usr/local/lib
> --with-openssl-dir=/usr/local/openssl/
>
> fails with:
> checking for libevent directory... configure: WARNING: We found the
Hi -
Trying to configure 0.2.9.9’s build with this command:
./configure --with-libevent-dir=/usr/local/lib
--with-openssl-dir=/usr/local/openssl/
fails with:
checking for libevent directory... configure: WARNING: We found the libraries
for libevent, but we could not find the C header files. Yo
On 26 Jan (15:05:26), George Kadianakis wrote:
> Hey list,
Hi!
First, big thanks for this write up!
>
> with service-side prop224 implementation moving forward, we need to pin down
> the directory structure of prop224 onion services. This will be very similar
> to
> the current directory struc
Hey list,
with service-side prop224 implementation moving forward, we need to pin down
the directory structure of prop224 onion services. This will be very similar to
the current directory structure, but with some mods to facilitate assymetric
client authorization keys and offline keys.
As people
teor:
>
>> On 12 Oct 2016, at 09:29, Jesse V wrote:
>>
>> On 10/11/2016 12:53 AM, Jeremy Rand wrote:
>>> It's also worth noting that it's been hard enough to get IETF to accept
>>> .bit (that effort stalled) -- adding a bunch of other TLD's would
>>> probably annoy IETF significantly (and destroy
