Always wondered how naming is relevant,
for example, IPv6 with OnionCat as a deterministic
form of naming. So now we propose a 'naming' layer.
Which should not also support IPv6 addressing?
Is not IPv6, subsequent to the 80bit scheme,
merely a name on top of onions? ie: If we develop
a 'naming' lay
> == Plan for current releases ==
>
> 0.2.4.x, 0.2.6.x, and 0.2.7.x, will all receive at least one more
>stable release. Support for them will end on 1 August 2017.
>
> 0.2.8.x will be supported until 1 January 2018.
>
> 0.2.5.x is retroactively declared an LTS release, and will be
>sup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi there!
another CollecTor version is available:
https://dist.torproject.org/collector/1.1.2/
The release provides the following changes
* CollecTor now uses the correct type annotation "@type tordnsel 1.0"
for exit lists again [0], and
*
