Re: [tor-dev] Is it safe for second_elapsed_callback() to be called less often?

> On 8 Dec. 2016, at 01:20, Michael Rogers wrote: > >> ... > > I'll spare you a long rant about the quality of Android's documentation > and just say that I looked into this, and in summary, an unprivileged > process can't use native calls to schedule alarms that will wake the CPU. > > (There

Re: [tor-dev] Is it safe for second_elapsed_callback() to be called less often?

On 02/12/16 16:56, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Michael Rogers > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> When running hidden services on Android I've found it's necessary to >> hold a wake lock to keep the CPU awake. Otherwise Tor's >> second_elapsed_callback() doesn't get called once per