On Mon, 05 Dec 2016 17:08:17 +0100
ban...@openmailbox.org wrote:
> TBB sandboxing is a great hardening measure. I was wondering if there
> are side-effects such as breaking setups that involve using anonymous
> networks other than Tor. Such as:
> https://thetinhat.com/tutorials/darknets/i2p-brow
> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 10:32, David Goulet wrote:
>
> On 06 Dec (10:09:57), teor wrote:
>>
>>> ...
>
>>
>> Here's a suggested strategy:
>> * at load time, validate the HS options as if v2 is the default, and
>> validate them as if v3 is the default, and fail if either validation
>> fails.
>>
On 06 Dec (10:09:57), teor wrote:
>
> > On 6 Dec. 2016, at 09:56, David Goulet wrote:
> >
> > On 06 Dec (09:43:20), teor wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 08:02, David Goulet wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 06 Dec (07:53:16), teor wrote:
>
> > On 6 Dec. 2016, at 07:42, David Goulet wrote:
> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 09:56, David Goulet wrote:
>
> On 06 Dec (09:43:20), teor wrote:
>>
>>> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 08:02, David Goulet wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06 Dec (07:53:16), teor wrote:
> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 07:42, David Goulet wrote:
>
> On 22 Nov (17:36:33), David Goulet wrote
On 06 Dec (09:43:20), teor wrote:
>
> > On 6 Dec. 2016, at 08:02, David Goulet wrote:
> >
> > On 06 Dec (07:53:16), teor wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 07:42, David Goulet wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 22 Nov (17:36:33), David Goulet wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> We are soon at the
> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 08:02, David Goulet wrote:
>
> On 06 Dec (07:53:16), teor wrote:
>>
>>> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 07:42, David Goulet wrote:
>>>
>>> On 22 Nov (17:36:33), David Goulet wrote:
Hi everyone!
We are soon at the stage of implementing the service part of proposal 224
>
On 06 Dec (07:53:16), teor wrote:
>
> > On 6 Dec. 2016, at 07:42, David Goulet wrote:
> >
> > On 22 Nov (17:36:33), David Goulet wrote:
> >> Hi everyone!
> >>
> >> We are soon at the stage of implementing the service part of proposal 224
> >> (next gen. hidden service.). Parent ticket is #20657
> On 6 Dec. 2016, at 07:42, David Goulet wrote:
>
> On 22 Nov (17:36:33), David Goulet wrote:
>> Hi everyone!
>>
>> We are soon at the stage of implementing the service part of proposal 224
>> (next gen. hidden service.). Parent ticket is #20657 but I'll be discussing
>> here ticket #18054.
>>
On 22 Nov (17:36:33), David Goulet wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> We are soon at the stage of implementing the service part of proposal 224
> (next gen. hidden service.). Parent ticket is #20657 but I'll be discussing
> here ticket #18054.
>
> In a nutshell, we need to figure out the interface for the
TBB sandboxing is a great hardening measure. I was wondering if there
are side-effects such as breaking setups that involve using anonymous
networks other than Tor. Such as:
https://thetinhat.com/tutorials/darknets/i2p-browser-setup-guide.html
As a workaround we can document how to toggle the
10 matches
Mail list logo