Re: [tor-dev] prop224: What should we do with torrc options?

2016-11-27 Thread teor
> On 28 Nov. 2016, at 03:24, David Goulet wrote: > > On 27 Nov (00:44:39), Matthew Finkel wrote: >> On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:25:44PM +1100, teor wrote: >>> On 26 Nov. 2016, at 02:25, David Goulet wrote: >> >> 2) It also means we create an option that will get deprecated o

Re: [tor-dev] prop224: What should we do with torrc options?

2016-11-27 Thread Matthew Finkel
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 01:07:02PM -0500, chelsea komlo wrote: > Hi, > > >> Yes, the onion-service-version and the version of the descriptor that tor > >> publishes are now tightly coupled, comparing v2 and v3. However, this may > >> not always be the case and, indeed, was not the case previously

Re: [tor-dev] prop224: What should we do with torrc options?

2016-11-27 Thread Matthew Finkel
On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 11:24:11AM -0500, David Goulet wrote: > On 27 Nov (00:44:39), Matthew Finkel wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:25:44PM +1100, teor wrote: > > > > On 26 Nov. 2016, at 02:25, David Goulet wrote: > > > > > > > >>> > > > >>> 2) It also means we create an option that will

Re: [tor-dev] prop224: What should we do with torrc options?

2016-11-27 Thread chelsea komlo
Hi, >> Yes, the onion-service-version and the version of the descriptor that tor >> publishes are now tightly coupled, comparing v2 and v3. However, this may >> not always be the case and, indeed, was not the case previously. I'm not >> saying HiddenServiceVersion is not the correct torrc option,

Re: [tor-dev] prop224: What should we do with torrc options?

2016-11-27 Thread David Goulet
On 27 Nov (00:44:39), Matthew Finkel wrote: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2016 at 09:25:44PM +1100, teor wrote: > > > > > On 26 Nov. 2016, at 02:25, David Goulet wrote: > > > > > >>> > > >>> 2) It also means we create an option that will get deprecated once v2 is > > >>> phased out so we are adding a "tem