Hi,
David Goulet wrote:
> On 24 Nov (11:13:06), teor wrote:
>>
>>> On 24 Nov. 2016, at 11:04, Yawning Angel wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 01:43:15 +0200
>>> s7r wrote:
I agree that this would be "the technical way" to do it, but real
world usability kind of prevents us to do it th
Hello,
George Kadianakis wrote:
> Nick Mathewson writes:
>
>> [ text/plain ]
>> Hi! I thought I'd write this up while it was fresh in my mind. It
>> could be used as an alternative method to the current proposed client
>> authentication mechanism. We could implement both, or just this, or
>>
On 25 Nov (10:33:35), teor wrote:
>
> > On 25 Nov. 2016, at 03:40, David Goulet wrote:
> >
> > On 24 Nov (11:13:06), teor wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 24 Nov. 2016, at 11:04, Yawning Angel wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 01:43:15 +0200
> >>> s7r wrote:
> I agree that this would be "the t