teor wrote:
>
>> On 3 Nov. 2016, at 10:37, s7r wrote:
>>
>> I am very happy with the torspec patch.
>>
>> Not quoting entirely, only want to add something wrt randomizing the
>> value for fake clients based on David's and teor's comments:
>>
>> David Goulet wrote:
>> [SNIP]
>>>
>>> - I think "sup
> On 3 Nov. 2016, at 10:37, s7r wrote:
>
> I am very happy with the torspec patch.
>
> Not quoting entirely, only want to add something wrt randomizing the
> value for fake clients based on David's and teor's comments:
>
> David Goulet wrote:
> [SNIP]
>>
>> - I think "superencrypted" -> "supe
I am very happy with the torspec patch.
Not quoting entirely, only want to add something wrt randomizing the
value for fake clients based on David's and teor's comments:
David Goulet wrote:
[SNIP]
>
> - I think "superencrypted" -> "super-encrypted" would be nicer as everything
> in the descrip
> On 3 Nov. 2016, at 04:45, David Goulet wrote:
>
> - I think "superencrypted" -> "super-encrypted" would be nicer as everything
> in the descriptor as that separation of word. Or even "client-encrypted" if
> we want to add extra semantic. No strong opinion apart from the "-" :).
client-encry
On 01 Nov (13:32:13), George Kadianakis wrote:
> David Goulet writes:
>
> > [ text/plain ]
> > On 17 Oct (13:35:24), George Kadianakis wrote:
> >> George Kadianakis writes:
> >>
> >> > [ text/plain ]
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > we've reached the point in prop224 development where we need to pin