Hi,
I think that this work is extremely important, and I applaud the
authors and contributors for their work. It seems that it will also
be complicated, semantically. What lies where, and which thing
does what? The example recently about what is sent in the Host
header is a good example of this
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:51 PM, grarpamp wrote:
> Freenet has talk on their lists of adding 100 new onioncat nodes
> to tor and i2p as linked to in this thread...
>
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2016-June/011108.html
More folks blogging related to the above...
http://mh7mkfve
On 10/08/2016 08:50 AM, 61wxg...@vfemail.net wrote:
> How about specifying whether the Namecoin domain should point to .onion
> or clearnet in the domain? We can require that TLDs for such service
> must end in either:
>
> o o: The name points to a .onion name.
>
> o i: The name points to an IP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
Why run a separate process instead of using unix socket or TCP socket?
Since a Namecoin domain can point to IP addresses and ICANN-based DNS
names in addition to onion service names, and a Namecoin domain owner
might wish to switch between th
Hi,
Why run a separate process instead of using unix socket or TCP socket?
> Since a Namecoin domain can point to IP addresses and ICANN-based DNS
> names in addition to onion service names, and a Namecoin domain owner
> might wish to switch between these configurations without causing
> downtime
