This is awesome, Karsten!
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/09/16 18:13, Georg Koppen wrote:
>> Here are the graphs showing initial downloads, update pings and
>> update requests over time:
>>
>> https://people.torp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/09/16 18:13, Georg Koppen wrote:
> Here are the graphs showing initial downloads, update pings and
> update requests over time:
>
> https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/torbrowser-annotated-2016-09-11.pdf
Here's
>
the same graph wit
David Goulet:
> The thing that worries me about the approach of:
> "Publishes somewhere their v3 address and cross-cert*."
>
> ... is the amount of more traffic and complexity we had to the network for
> such a thing. I for sure don't want Tor to maintain some sorts of registry
> here just for
On 13 Sep (21:45:00), Ivan Markin wrote:
> Forking this thread to discuss onion service transition path.
>
> David Goulet:
> > The question arise now. Someone running a .onion upgrades her tor that
> > supports v3, should we allow v2 to continue running or transition it to v3
> > or
> > make them
David Fifield:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 11:12:15AM -0400, Mark Smith wrote:
>> On 9/11/16 3:45 PM, David Fifield wrote:
* We don't know what (8) or (9) is but it seems to us we are losing
users over time and are only getting them back slowly if at all. A
weekday/weekend pattern is v
