On 6/23/16, grarpamp wrote:
> Don't forget to add around 1000+ ms latency.
Should say that on average tor's not that high, but
as to prudently setting somewhat higher timeouts,
especially for initial setup where the '+' may indeed
apply.
___
tor-dev mai
On 6/24/16, konst...@mail2tor.com wrote:
> Chinese users can reach Freenet again with Tor. China blocks Freenet with
> DPI for a long time.
This use case is nice to hear. Compared to other networks and
attack vectors it's not the best at, Tor has put good effort into
and is rather strong at gett
> konst...@mail2tor.com writes:
>
>> [ text/plain ]
>> I posted steps on how to connect Freenet nodes over Onioncat and
>> Garlicat
>> for Tor/I2P. I am looking to scale it into an Opennet inside Tor with a
>> lot of peers:
>>
>> https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2016-June/039056.html
>
Hello everyone,
I know the next status report is not due until next week but I wanted to
get some feedback on how I use cookies and localStorage on FP Central.
Right now, due the very short lifespan of cookies in the Tor browser, I
don't use cookies as an identification mechanism but as an
expira
> Frankly, I don't know. I don't actually install Tor from packages
> myself, since I'm nearly always running Tor from master.
>
> People who download our RPMs: in what way are they beneficial?
since no one spoke up, I created:
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/19501
signature.a
=== remoTor is a whole lot smarter than last time now. ===
When remoTor is running on the same machine as tor, it can
now also monitor the hostnames the tor process is building
circuits for. You may want to do this if you have devices in
your house that you don't trust, for example. The regular To
Hi, ex-Freenet developer here.
konst...@mail2tor.com:
> Is the extra traffic desirable in Tor? Reading asn's comment, I was under
> the impression that you are interested in adding higher latency traffic
> such as Freenet or mixnets for better anonymity:
> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/crowdfun
On 06/24/2016 02:27 PM, Nicolas Vigier wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Pierre Laperdrix wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 06/23/2016 05:19 PM, Nicolas Vigier wrote:
>>> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Pierre Laperdrix wrote:
>>>
Hi everyone,
Here is my second status report for my GSOC project.
A littl
konst...@mail2tor.com writes:
> [ text/plain ]
> I posted steps on how to connect Freenet nodes over Onioncat and Garlicat
> for Tor/I2P. I am looking to scale it into an Opennet inside Tor with a
> lot of peers:
>
> https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/2016-June/039056.html
> https://emu
On Fri, 24 Jun 2016, Pierre Laperdrix wrote:
>
>
> On 06/23/2016 05:19 PM, Nicolas Vigier wrote:
> > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Pierre Laperdrix wrote:
> >
> >> Hi everyone,
> >>
> >> Here is my second status report for my GSOC project.
> >> A little reminder that the repo is located on GitHub:
> >>
George Kadianakis writes:
> [ text/plain ]
> Hello people,
>
> I invite you to check out another round of time period-related prop224 spec
> changes, based on our discussions in Montreal. These new changes simplify the
> overlap descriptor publishing logic, and improve the caching lifetime of
> d
David Goulet wrote (21 Jun 2016 13:43:13 GMT) :
> I'm releasing a long overdue version of torsocks 2.2.0 release candidate 1.
Thank you! It's now available in Debian experimental (for Debian
testing/unstable users).
Cheers!
--
intrigeri
___
tor-dev mail
On 06/23/2016 05:19 PM, Nicolas Vigier wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, Pierre Laperdrix wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> Here is my second status report for my GSOC project.
>> A little reminder that the repo is located on GitHub:
>> https://github.com/plaperdr/fp-central
>
> I have looked at this
13 matches
Mail list logo
