Re: [tor-dev] [GSoC 2016] Orfox - Report 2

2016-06-16 Thread Tom Ritter
On 16 June 2016 at 18:45, Amogh Pradeep wrote: > Hey guys, > > This is my second status report for GSoC 2016. > > I’ve finally managed to rebase things to ESR 45.2.0 :D [0]. > But unfortunately, I think that what it is build on is unstable, so we don’t > have an ask ready yet. > I will continue t

[tor-dev] [GSoC 2016] Orfox - Report 2

2016-06-16 Thread Amogh Pradeep
Hey guys, This is my second status report for GSoC 2016. I’ve finally managed to rebase things to ESR 45.2.0 :D [0]. But unfortunately, I think that what it is build on is unstable, so we don’t have an ask ready yet. I will continue to work on this, and hopefully have a successful build soon. N

Re: [tor-dev] We need a new RPM maintainer

2016-06-16 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:06 AM, nusenu wrote: > What is the Tor Project's motivation for providing RPMs (instead of > relying on the RPM distro maintainer)? Frankly, I don't know. I don't actually install Tor from packages myself, since I'm nearly always running Tor from master. People who dow

Re: [tor-dev] We need a new RPM maintainer

2016-06-16 Thread Tom van der Woerdt
I can do it. I already package my own RPMs, so I may as well do that properly. No ldap account though. Tom > On 16 Jun 2016, at 15:06, Nick Mathewson wrote: > > Hi, all! > > Ondrej Mikle, who has built our RPMs for a while, is no longer able to > do so. (He isn't using RPM distros any more

Re: [tor-dev] We need a new RPM maintainer

2016-06-16 Thread nusenu
What is the Tor Project's motivation for providing RPMs (instead of relying on the RPM distro maintainer)? I think jamie is doing a great job at maintaining Fedora's and EPEL RPMs. I switched to his RPMs for their systemd and multi-instance support. The only thing you don't get from Fedora/EPEL i

[tor-dev] We need a new RPM maintainer

2016-06-16 Thread Nick Mathewson
Hi, all! Ondrej Mikle, who has built our RPMs for a while, is no longer able to do so. (He isn't using RPM distros any more, doesn't have as much free time, and etc.) First: Thanks, Ondrej, for all your hard work! Here's the instructions he sent on how to do it (quoted with permission): {{{ Basi

Re: [tor-dev] Tor with collective signatures

2016-06-16 Thread Nicolas Gailly
Hi, Here's a new version of the proposal with some minor fixes discussed with teor last time. 0.4: - changed *included* to *appended* - 3.2: end of paragraph, a valid consensus document contains a majority of CoSi signatures. - Acknowledgments include teor and Tom Ritter.