On 20/05/16 18:23, grarpamp wrote:
> On 4/30/16, str4d wrote:
>> On 27/04/16 22:31, grarpamp wrote:
>>> I think there are a nontrivial number of users interested in, and
>>> using, non-strictly-TCP transport over an IPv6 tunnel interface.
>>> For example, look at users of CJDNS...
>>>
>>> For whic
> > But do we really need to?
>
> No. The person is complaining about something with 16 MiB of
> non-volatile storage anyway.
>
I'm not complaining. I just care about Tor on the router. Memory usage
is a concern, and I was wondering if something can be done about it
*before* it becomes a proble
