Hi Mridul,
I'm copying tor-dev@, so other folks can chime in.
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:16:45AM +0530, Mridul Malpotra wrote:
> a) Can you give me a short description about the program flow on how the
> EventHandler class enables modules to be executed in exitmap? From my
> initial pondering ove
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 06:06:18PM +, Yawning Angel wrote:
> I'll probably add support for other (user-configurable?) cached content
> providers when I have time. The archive.is person doesn't seem to want
> to respond to e-mail, so asking them to optionally not set X-F-F, seems
> like it'll g
On Mon, 16 May 2016 20:54:42 +0200
Jeff Burdges wrote:
> Just a a couple questions :
>
> Is SIDH costing 100 times the CPU such a big deal, assuming it's
> running on another thread? Can it be abused for DOS attacks for
> example? Is that CPU time needed for symmetric crypto? etc. If so,
> i
Just a a couple questions :
Is SIDH costing 100 times the CPU such a big deal, assuming it's running
on another thread? Can it be abused for DOS attacks for example? Is
that CPU time needed for symmetric crypto? etc. If so, is it worth
restricting to your guard node?
Is New Hope's 3+ times
ban...@openmailbox.org transcribed 0.7K bytes:
> Some great developments in lattice-based crypto. DJB just released a paper
> on NTRU Prime:
>
>
> 1. Competitively fast compared to the leading lattice-based cryptosystems
> including New Hope.
>
> 2. Safer implementation of NTRU that avoids vulne
I sent my first GSoC report only to tor-dev and forgot to send it to
tails-dev too. I quote it in full at the end of this mail.
sajolida:
> segfault:
>> this is the first status report on the Tails Server GSoC project. I
>> officially began working on it on April 25th, although I already did
>> so
