Re: [tor-dev] Firejail Integration

2016-05-13 Thread Yawning Angel
On Fri, 13 May 2016 17:06:26 +0200 ban...@openmailbox.org wrote: > Hi Yawning. We are thinking about how to integrate your Firejail > profile [0] in Whonix. Do you plan to upstream the changes in the > start-tor-browser script soon? I wasn't planning on it. It's a work in progress, there are usa

[tor-dev] Firejail Integration

2016-05-13 Thread bancfc
Hi Yawning. We are thinking about how to integrate your Firejail profile [0] in Whonix. Do you plan to upstream the changes in the start-tor-browser script soon? If not then what is the best way to ensure the custom script survives TBB upgrades? [0] https://git.schwanenlied.me/yawning/tor-f

Re: [tor-dev] [proposal] Post-Quantum Secure Hybrid Handshake Based on NewHope

2016-05-13 Thread William Whyte
Hi all, > 3. The only implementation that mitigates decryption failures completely, killing information leaks to adversaries. This is clearly a nice-to-have feature, but it comes with a tradeoff. To remove decryption failures you need to increase the parameter q, but this affects size (and so per

Re: [tor-dev] exitmap modules that make *lots* of connections

2016-05-13 Thread Zack Weinberg
On 05/08/2016 03:49 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 04:22:48PM -0400, Zack Weinberg wrote: >> I'm working on an exitmap module that wants to feed order of 5000 >> short-lived streams through each exit relay. I think this is running >> foul of some sort of upper limit (in STEM