Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Tor with collective signatures

2016-04-30 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 1 May 2016, at 00:56, Nicolas Gailly wrote: > >>> 4.2 Benefits >>> >>>Technically, it is quite easy to implement witness cosigning if the >>> group >>>of witnesses is small. If we want the group of witnesses to be >>> large, however >>>– and we do, to ensure that compromising t

Re: [tor-dev] Summer of Privacy Application | Rohit Dua

2016-04-30 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 01:50:38PM -0700, Damian Johnson wrote: > if we'll be running SoP again this year We have no plans to run a separate "Summer of Privacy" this year. We're back in Google Summer of Code, and we have seven fine students. That should keep us busy I think. But that said, yes, th

Re: [tor-dev] Summer of Privacy Application | Rohit Dua

2016-04-30 Thread Damian Johnson
> I recently knew about this years Tor summer of code. Although the date of > application is gone, I would like to ask if I could still manage to get into > the program. Hi Rohit. Jury's still out if we'll be running SoP again this year (at present we're just focused on GSoC which will possibly re

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Tor with collective signatures

2016-04-30 Thread Nicolas Gailly
On 04/29/2016 05:13 PM, Tom Ritter wrote: >> The mechanism is similar for >> witnesses that went offline. The parent of an offline witness will >> set the bit >> in the bitmap of the failed witness. > You mention this in Cons as well - it seems like the parents in the > tree need to be more

[tor-dev] Summer of Privacy Application | Rohit Dua

2016-04-30 Thread Rohit Dua
Hi I recently knew about this years Tor summer of code. Although the date of application is gone, I would like to ask if I could still manage to get into the program. I'm interested in working on Tor technology. If not officially with the summer of code, could I work as an remote intern in any of