On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 4:32 AM, George Kadianakis
wrote:
> Fan Jiang writes:
>
> > [ text/plain ]
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Hello Fan and team,
> >>
> >> I think I'm not a big fan of the pending_guard and pending_dir_guard
> >> concept. To me it seems like a quick hack that tries to address
> fundamenta
I see, thanks a lot!
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Marcela S. Melara
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You're right, the way CONIKS is designed right now, the private indices
> are computed over the plaintext username, so it would be possible for a
> malicious server to collect newly registered usernames. But
Thanks Yawning.
> Most of the changes since the paper has been released have been minor.
> The last major algorithmic change I'm aware of was 20151209 which
> altered the reconciliation mechanism (I don't particularly count the
> March changes that changed the on-the-wire encoding format to be
>
On 11/04/16 12:42, George Kadianakis wrote:
> FWIW, I'm personally not sure how to choose the best "maximum acceptable
> clock skew"
> value here. My intuition tells me to choose a big number so that even very
> skewed clients can visit hidden services.
Sorry for the late reply. I just wanted to
David Goulet writes:
> [ text/plain ]
> On 13 Apr (15:34:54), George Kadianakis wrote:
>> David Goulet writes:
>>
>> > [ text/plain ]
>> > On 12 Apr (16:01:32), George Kadianakis wrote:
>> >> David Goulet writes:
>> >>
>> >> > [ text/plain ]
>> >> > On 11 Apr (14:42:02), George Kadianakis wro
Tim Wilson-Brown - teor writes:
> [ text/plain ]
>
>> On 20 Apr 2016, at 07:22, David Goulet wrote:
>>
>> On 18 Apr (13:18:25), George Kadianakis wrote:
>>> Tim Wilson-Brown - teor writes:
>>>
[ text/plain ]
> On 16 Apr 2016, at 05:47, David Goulet wrote:
>
> Hi!
Fan Jiang writes:
> [ text/plain ]
> Hi,
>
>> Hello Fan and team,
>>
>> I think I'm not a big fan of the pending_guard and pending_dir_guard
>> concept. To me it seems like a quick hack that tries to address fundamental
>> issues with our algorithm that appeared when we tried to adapt the
>> prop
