On 12 Apr (10:48:37), Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
>
> > On 12 Apr 2016, at 04:22, David Goulet wrote:
> >
> > On 08 Apr (10:15:19), Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I'm working on proposal 260's Rendezvous Single Onion Services in #17178.
> >>
> >> They are faster, beca
Tim Wilson-Brown - teor:
> We tried adding NonAnonymous to the name, and it was unwieldy. And it
> also confuses the semantics: what if we have multiple types of
> SingleOnionMode?
If we do have multiple types of SingleOnionMode we should specify this
type as a value to NonAnonymousOnionServiceMod
> On 12 Apr 2016, at 10:49, Ivan Markin wrote:
>
> David Goulet:
>> It's a bit weird to have to enable two options for one feature (single onion)
>> BUT I like the double torrc option forcing the users to understand what's
>> going on (also adding semantic to the config file).
>>
>> Bikesheding
David Goulet:
> It's a bit weird to have to enable two options for one feature (single onion)
> BUT I like the double torrc option forcing the users to understand what's
> going on (also adding semantic to the config file).
>
> Bikesheding: the name though could be a bit misleading. What if that t
> On 12 Apr 2016, at 04:22, David Goulet wrote:
>
> On 08 Apr (10:15:19), Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I'm working on proposal 260's Rendezvous Single Onion Services in #17178.
>>
>> They are faster, because they have one hop between the service and the
>> introduction and
On 08 Apr (10:15:19), Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm working on proposal 260's Rendezvous Single Onion Services in #17178.
>
> They are faster, because they have one hop between the service and the
> introduction and rendezvous points.
> But this means that their location is ea
On 11 Apr (14:42:02), George Kadianakis wrote:
> David Goulet writes:
>
> > [ text/plain ]
> > On 04 Apr (19:13:39), George Kadianakis wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> during March we discussed the cell formats of prop224:
> >> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2016-March/010534.html
I'm also planning to get rid of GeoIP support entirely -- it needs
binary packages, a (usually manually downloaded) database and it would
be cleaner and nicer to just use 'GETINFO ip-to-country/*' 100% of the
time (instead of just as a fallback). On top of that, it seems that the
Python packges do
David Goulet writes:
> [ text/plain ]
> On 04 Apr (19:13:39), George Kadianakis wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> during March we discussed the cell formats of prop224:
>> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2016-March/010534.html
>>
>> The prop224 topic for this month has to do with the way
