Re: [tor-dev] Much-revised draft, RFC: removing current obsolete clients from the network

The list of server/client -versions seems long and unuseful... 0.2.4.23 0.2.4.24 0.2.4.25 0.2.4.26 0.2.4.27 0.2.5.8-rc 0.2.5.9-rc 0.2.5.10 0.2.5.11 0.2.5.12 0.2.6.5-rc 0.2.6.6 0.2.6.7 0.2.6.8 0.2.6.9 0.2.6.10 0.2.7.1-alpha 0.2.7.2-alpha 0.2.7.3-rc 0.2.7.4-rc 0.2.7.5 0.2.7.6 0.2.8.1-alpha I'd cut

[tor-dev] A few ideas about improved design/modularity in Tor

(Hi! Here's a document I've been poking at , on and off, for a while. There's a lot more to say here, but I think it's ready to share with tor-dev for comment. Thanks!) ++ +++ 0. PRELIMINARIES. +++

[tor-dev] Using Let's Encrypt for meek bridges

I'm looking for ideas of good ways to handle TLS certificates and their renewal for meek bridges. I want to use Let's Encrypt for this process, and I hope that someone who knows Let's Encrypt well can contribute some ideas. All three of the meek bridges use HTTPS to receive connections from the CD

[tor-dev] Much-revised draft, RFC: removing current obsolete clients from the network

Hi, Nick Mathewson: I should try to clarify! Awesome! questions don't seem to apply to proposal 266 They are about the central control of a [somewhat] distributed network, specifically, the execution of clients on behalf of the operator. So, #264 & #266. I've tried to split the f

Re: [tor-dev] [GSoC '16] Exitmap project - Final Proposal

Really sorry for replying to my own mail! The initial mail threads for reference: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2016-March/010565.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2016-March/010566.html https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2016-March/010574.html On 2

[tor-dev] [GSoC '16] Exitmap project - Final Proposal

Hey everyone! I have completed my proposal on the project Exitmap improvements. Sorry for submitting it late. Link for suggestions: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AqjH3AsBbfesJg36SZg1frPQsdpAnJmzH8k1-G6dz70/edit?usp=sharing Some points that have changed from the previous discussion: 1. Tel

Re: [tor-dev] GSoC proposal: Panopticlick

Hi Georg, >Thanks. What does "check fingerprint's uniqueness" entail? Is it just a >"Unique? - Yes/No"-thing? If not, what are your ideas in this regard? I think it is not a "Yes/No"-thing. My idea is that the uniqueness of fingerprint is evaluated in each element relatively in recorded data and

Re: [tor-dev] Should we disable the collection of some stats published in extra-infos?

> On Feb 11, 2016, at 2:51 PM, Rob Jansen wrote: > >> These statistics are being collected for years now, and it might take >> another year or so for relays to upgrade to stop collecting them. So >> what's another month. >> > > Agreed. Hi Karsten, Could you please summarize your current pla

Re: [tor-dev] Notes from the prop259 proposal reading group

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 01:51:53PM +0200, George Kadianakis wrote: > In the future we should make it so that all Guards are both Stable and Fast, > so that this stupid check does not need to happen [TODO: I should open a > ticket for this if it doesn't already exist]. https://trac.torproject

[tor-dev] [GSoC 16] Proposal to work on the Ahmia.fi search engine

Hi everyone, I'm a french student and I would like to share my GSoC application with all of you. I plan to work on the Ahmia hidden service search engine. Because of my experience with python, django and web in general, I feel like I can make a substantial contribution to this project during summ

[tor-dev] Review of GSoC proposal - Ahmia.fi

Hi people, Sorry for the late approach. Here is my proposal for the project, Improving Ahmia.fi, search engine for hidden services. Any suggestions are most welcome. Thanks to Juha ( juha.nu...@ahmia.fi ) for helping me out with the proposal. I'll be available on irc as 'skrish13' or you can comme

[tor-dev] Notes from the prop259 proposal reading group

Hello, we had a meeting about proposal 259 "New Guard Selection Behaviour". You can see the logs here: http://meetbot.debian.net/tor-dev/2016/tor-dev.2016-03-23-15.01.log.txt Some notes: - The latest version of the proposal can be found here: https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 259: New Guard Selection Behaviour

Tim Wilson-Brown - teor writes: > [ text/plain ] > >> On 25 Mar 2016, at 00:31, George Kadianakis wrote: >> >> Tim Wilson-Brown - teor mailto:teor2...@gmail.com>> >> writes: >> >>> [ text/plain ] >>> On 24 Mar 2016, at 22:55, George Kadianakis >>> > wrote: >