> On 20 Feb 2016, at 16:28, Xiaofan Li wrote:
>
> Here is a question that we have about security:
> Since QUIC comes with a transport layer security, we are worried that this
> feature is conflicting with TOR's application layer security. By
> "conflicting", I don't mean the QUIC will sabotage
I decided to move the meek cost emails to the tor-project list, because
they are more project-y than dev-y. Here is the email for January 2016:
https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-project/2016-February/000101.html
There's a table of all previous summaries here:
https://trac.torproject.org
On 19/02/16 16:21, Spencer wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>
>> Nathan Freitas:
>> Mozilla
>>
>
> At what point do the efforts to patch Firefox out weigh the efforts to build
> a browser from scratch?
>
>
> Wordlife,
> Spencer
>
>
>
> ___
> tor-dev mailing list
>
Hi Tim:
Thank you so much for replying.
I hope to address your questions in detail in this email, as well as posing
some questions in the second part regarding some parts that we are less
sure of.
1. Question of scope. Regarding the question of:
> It's unclear whether your proposal is to:
> * rep
On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 16:21 +, Spencer wrote:
> At what point do the efforts to patch Firefox out weigh the efforts
> to build a browser from scratch?
Browsers are extremely complicated.
If you want to explore Mozilla's efforts to build a more modern
browser, then I suggest you look over an
Hi,
>
> Nathan Freitas:
> Mozilla
>
At what point do the efforts to patch Firefox out weigh the efforts to build a
browser from scratch?
Wordlife,
Spencer
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/
On 2/19/16, Nathan Freitas wrote:
> Mozilla is adding some new runtime installation features to reduce the
> size of the mobile Firefox APK. Is this happening at all on desktop? It
> makes me nervous as the "default" config could very much more greatly,
> not to mention having a new centralized at
Mozilla is adding some new runtime installation features to reduce the
size of the mobile Firefox APK. Is this happening at all on desktop? It
makes me nervous as the "default" config could very much more greatly,
not to mention having a new centralized attack channel.
- Original message -
