Re: [tor-dev] Next (and subsequent) proposal discussion meetings

2016-02-03 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Nick Mathewson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:01 AM, isis wrote: >> isis transcribed 2.7K bytes: >>> Nick Mathewson transcribed 1.3K bytes: >>> > First, the next meeting is scheduled on #tor-dev this Thursday, at >>> > 9:00 am EST (=1400 UTC). We'll be discuss

Re: [tor-dev] Next (and subsequent) proposal discussion meetings

2016-02-03 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Zhenfei Zhang wrote: > 8:30 am EST tomorrow is good for me too. > Just wondering, though, do you have a pointer to some tutorial of the IRC > that we will be using? > Thanks! > Hm. http://www.oftc.net/ links to some information that could be helpful; the name of

Re: [tor-dev] Next (and subsequent) proposal discussion meetings

2016-02-03 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:01 AM, isis wrote: > isis transcribed 2.7K bytes: >> Nick Mathewson transcribed 1.3K bytes: >> > First, the next meeting is scheduled on #tor-dev this Thursday, at >> > 9:00 am EST (=1400 UTC). We'll be discussing these proposals: >> >* Proposal 263: Postquantum circ

Re: [tor-dev] Quantum-safe Hybrid handshake for Tor

2016-02-03 Thread Jeff Burdges
On Fri, 2016-01-01 at 11:14 +, Yawning Angel wrote: > On Thu, 31 Dec 2015 20:51:43 + > isis wrote: > [snip] > > I feel like there needs to be some new terminology here. It's > > certainly not post-quantum secure, but "quantum-safe" doesn't seem > > right either, because it's exactly the

Re: [tor-dev] Next (and subsequent) proposal discussion meetings

2016-02-03 Thread Zhenfei Zhang
8:30 am EST tomorrow is good for me too. Just wondering, though, do you have a pointer to some tutorial of the IRC that we will be using? Thanks! Zhenfei On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:09 AM, William Whyte < wwh...@securityinnovation.com> wrote: > I can make that time, though I may be a bit late beca

Re: [tor-dev] Next (and subsequent) proposal discussion meetings

2016-02-03 Thread William Whyte
I can make that time, though I may be a bit late because of school drop-off. William On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:01 AM, isis wrote: > isis transcribed 2.7K bytes: > > Nick Mathewson transcribed 1.3K bytes: > > > First, the next meeting is scheduled on #tor-dev this Thursday, at > > > 9:00 am EST (

Re: [tor-dev] Getting people started on guard selection algorithms [prop259]

2016-02-03 Thread George Kadianakis
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 02:29:22PM -0500, Ola Bini wrote: >> Hi, >> >> We have now started looking at the proposal and the existing code. Our >> current plan is to first of all code more of the simulations referred >> to in stuff-to-test.txt. We also noticed that the hashring >> implementation f

Re: [tor-dev] Next (and subsequent) proposal discussion meetings

2016-02-03 Thread isis
isis transcribed 2.7K bytes: > Nick Mathewson transcribed 1.3K bytes: > > First, the next meeting is scheduled on #tor-dev this Thursday, at > > 9:00 am EST (=1400 UTC). We'll be discussing these proposals: > >* Proposal 263: Postquantum circuit extension > >* Proposal 249: Large create c