Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 247: Alternate Path Lengths

David Goulet: > On 21 Jan (10:28:16), Mike Perry wrote: > > George Kadianakis: > > > Mike Perry writes: > > > > > > > George Kadianakis: > > > >> Mike Perry writes: > > > >> > > > >> > George Kadianakis: > > > >> > > I have mixed feelings about this. > > > >> > > > > > >> > > - If client guard

[tor-dev] Proposals should have reviews. Let's make sure that happens. Here's a schedule.

Hi, > > Nick Mathewson: > We should make a chart of what > times we have in common. :) > http://www.when2meet.com Wordlife, Spencer ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Re: [tor-dev] Proposals should have reviews. Let's make sure that happens. Here's a schedule.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > > On 26 Jan 2016, at 23:19, David Goulet wrote: > > On 26 Jan (07:00:31), Nick Mathewson wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 5:14 AM, David Goulet wrote: > > On 18 Jan (07:13:36), Tim Wilson-Brown - teor wrote: > > > On 15 Jan 2016

[tor-dev] Notes from 3rd Tor proposal reading group [prop250]

Hello there, yesterday we held another reading group on #tor-dev to discuss proposal 250 (Random Number Generation During Tor Voting). You can find the logs here: http://meetbot.debian.net/tor-dev/2016/tor-dev.2016-01-26-15.58.log.html Here are some code and spec changes that we need to do afte