Re: [tor-dev] Proposals should have reviews. Let's make sure that happens. Here's a schedule.

2016-01-17 Thread isis
Nick Mathewson transcribed 2.8K bytes: > Here's the schedule I have in mind for the first meeting, based on > proposals already nominated at the IRC dev meeting. This idea and the schedule sound great to me. (Minus that the HS devs should be at the HS one.) Thanks, Nick! Side note: I've never

Re: [tor-dev] How many exits exit from an IP address different than their OR address? (10.7%)

2016-01-17 Thread David Fifield
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 10:24:47PM +, cacahuatl wrote: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 01:01:03PM +0100, coderman wrote: > > misguided because it won't work as you expect, the right way to check > > is to build circuits and see where they exit from. you can do this > > yourself! > > Tor Project alrea

Re: [tor-dev] How many exits exit from an IP address different than their OR address? (10.7%)

2016-01-17 Thread cacahuatl
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 01:01:03PM +0100, coderman wrote: > misguided because it won't work as you expect, the right way to check > is to build circuits and see where they exit from. you can do this > yourself! Tor Project already does it for you with archived data and everything: https://collector

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Load Balancing with Overhead Parameters

2016-01-17 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 15 Jan 2016, at 03:07, Mike Perry wrote: > > Tim Wilson-Brown - teor: >>> On 13 Jan 2016, at 00:53, Mike Perry >> > wrote: >>> 1. Overview >>> >>> For padding overhead due to Proposals 251 and 254, and changes to hidden >>> service path selection in Proposa

Re: [tor-dev] Proposals should have reviews. Let's make sure that happens. Here's a schedule.

2016-01-17 Thread Tim Wilson-Brown - teor
> On 15 Jan 2016, at 03:31, David Goulet wrote: > >> Friday January 29: 8:30 am eastern (1330 UTC) >> >> Prop#252: Single Onion Services [DRAFT] >> Prop#260: Rendezvous Single Onion Services [DRAFT] >> Prop#246: Merging Hidden Service Directories and Introduction Points >> [OPEN]

[tor-dev] Much-revised draft, RFC: removing current obsolete clients from the network

2016-01-17 Thread Spencer
Hi, Nick Mathewson: [This is a significantly revised version of the last version of this proposal draft, sent here for comment.] Questions? The last version of this draft was https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/2015-September/009587.html I asked some questions to this draft

Re: [tor-dev] How many exits exit from an IP address different than their OR address? (10.7%)

2016-01-17 Thread coderman
On 1/14/16, Virgil Griffith wrote: > In our quantifications of relay diversity, knowing the IP addresses that > traffic exits from is important. Ways to have this information correctly > reported would be very helpful. i want to be very clear: asking relays to report their public exit IPs in cen