On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:56 AM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> Just as a data point, I don't see much scanning/abuse regarding SMTPS
> (465)
SUBMISSION (567) is what is used these days as relay to send mail.
465 is a legacy bug.
25 fronts your @address.
See wikipedia for more info.
> or IMAPS (993).
POP
Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 08/01/16 16:54, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Karsten Loesing wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/01/16 18:48, Fabian Keil wrote:
> >>> Looking at "Tor metrics - Relays by platform" [0] one could
> >>> think that the number of "FreeBSD" relays is only slightly
> >>> lower than the nu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/01/16 16:54, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Karsten Loesing wrote:
>
>> On 07/01/16 18:48, Fabian Keil wrote:
>>> Looking at "Tor metrics - Relays by platform" [0] one could
>>> think that the number of "FreeBSD" relays is only slightly
>>> lower than th
>>> Is it possible that the "Tor metrics" count everything but "Linux"
>>> and "Windows" as FreeBSD?
>>
>> Good question. Not exactly: it's counting everything containing "BSD"
>> as "FreeBSD". Ugh. I agree that this is misleading. How about we
>> change the graph legend to "BSD"?
+1
> W
Karsten Loesing wrote:
> On 07/01/16 18:48, Fabian Keil wrote:
> > Looking at "Tor metrics - Relays by platform" [0] one could think
> > that the number of "FreeBSD" relays is only slightly lower than the
> > number of "Windows" relays.
> >
> > It also looks like the number of "other" platforms
> On 7 Jan 2016, at 02:23, Virgil Griffith wrote:
>
> I would argue that the existence of this longer policy discussion, with no
> obvious solution, is why it behoves us to separate policy (as much as
> possible) from Tor's core mechanism.
As far as I understand the code, clients choose exit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/01/16 18:48, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Looking at "Tor metrics - Relays by platform" [0] one could think
> that the number of "FreeBSD" relays is only slightly lower than the
> number of "Windows" relays.
>
> It also looks like the number of "other"
