> On 21 Nov 2015, at 05:38, David Goulet wrote:
>
>
> I know that we have sometimes 1, 4, 5, 6 or 7 hops circuit but the general
> case
> is considered here and we have no stats on how frequent those unusual circuits
> are.
When I tested hidden service path lengths:
Most clients cannibalize
> On 20 Nov 2015, at 10:59, George Kadianakis wrote:
>
> David Goulet mailto:dgou...@ev0ke.net>> writes:
>
>> On 19 Nov (14:30:47), Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>>> Hi George,
>>>
>>> On 11/12/15, George Kadianakis wrote:
Hello there believers of prop250,
you can find the latest ver
> On 21 Nov 2015, at 04:14, Michael Rogers wrote:
>
> On 20/11/15 16:24, David Goulet wrote:
>># Consensus
>>(This goes for both previous and current SRV)
>>if SRV in consensus:
>>dirauth MUST keep it even if the one they have doesn't match.
>>Majority has decided wha
On 18 November 2015 at 16:32, David Fifield wrote:
> There was an unfortunate outage of meek-amazon (not the result of
> censorship, just operations failure). Between 30 September and 9 October
> the bridge had an expired HTTPS certificate.
> [tor-talk] Outage of meek-amazon
>
> h
Hello everyone!
I would like to share this graph I've been working on along side with Aaron
Johnson (thanks to him for the algorithm I'll be describing).
This shows both the maximum additional and total traffic the network can
sustain for both HS and Exit. The "additional" traffic here means that
On 20/11/15 16:24, David Goulet wrote:
> # Consensus
> (This goes for both previous and current SRV)
> if SRV in consensus:
> dirauth MUST keep it even if the one they have doesn't match.
> Majority has decided what should be used.
> else:
> dirauth MUST disc
didn't get the latest consensus to at least get the previous
> SRV, we return in bootstrap?
>
> Cheers!
> David
>
> >
> > Now we are going to use the SRV lines in the votes as an indicator on
> how the
> > consensus creation should play out.
> >
> >
On 20 Nov (10:19:07), David Goulet wrote:
> On 20 Nov (16:06:59), George Kadianakis wrote:
> > s7r writes:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The idea of adding flags in the votes so each dirauth can advertise if
> > > it is participating (has an opinion for the SR or not) is
> > > great
On 20 Nov (16:06:59), George Kadianakis wrote:
> s7r writes:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > The idea of adding flags in the votes so each dirauth can advertise if
> > it is participating (has an opinion for the SR or not) is
> > great and helps us build more defenses, probably make it easier in t
s7r writes:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> The idea of adding flags in the votes so each dirauth can advertise if
> it is participating (has an opinion for the SR or not) is
> great and helps us build more defenses, probably make it easier in the
> future too if we decide to change anything.
>
> What if the
10 matches
Mail list logo
