On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 11:16 AM, teor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there any reason an onion service would want to temporarily switch from
> 1-hop to 3-hop paths?
> Is it ok if we force operators to restart the tor instance when onion
> service path lengths change?
Just said on IRC, but saying here to
Aaron Johnson:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Here are some specific comments on the proposal, most of which I
> didn’t mention at the session yesterday.
>
> Sec. 2: “When a hidden service picks its guard nodes, it also picks
> two additional sets of middle nodes `second_guard_set` and
> `third_guard_set` of siz
> On Nov 2, 2015, at 20:39, Paul Syverson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 09:05:26PM +0200, George Kadianakis wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> as you might know, the IETF recently decided to formally recognize .onion
>> names
>> as special-use domain names [0].
>>
>> This means that normal browsers
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 10:01 PM, isis wrote:
>If you need some application to have the ability to associate your LinkedIn
>address with your relay, then write a program which uses (one of) your
For what it's worth, the LinkedIn reference was my attempt at humor to
add levity to otherwise
> A. You still appear to be confusing the terms "torrc" and "extrainfo".
I recognize this error and will fix it.
> B. Do you mean for all extrainfo descriptors?
I support excluding Bridge relays for exactly the reasons you
mentioned. My sole is to clean up the bitcoin addresses in the
ContactIn
Virgil Griffith transcribed 10K bytes:
> Yes I did. Here's the modified proposal.
>
> Filename: ExtraRelayDescriptorFields.txt
> Title: Adding X-namespace to extra-info descriptor for key:value pairs
> Author: Virgil Griffith
> Created: 2015-09-30
> Status: Open
>
>
> 1. Motivation
> We wish to
