Hi,
just a reminder that the applications team is starting the monthly
meetings next week on Tuesday, November 3 at 19:00 UTC[0] in
#tor-project on irc.oftc.net.
The proposed topic is still talking about UX/internationalization
issues. If there are other things worth discussing we can easily amen
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 5:01 PM, isis wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For your reviewing pleasure, may I present you with a new (draft) proposal for
> a new entry guard selection algorithm, and associated data structures (with
> reference implementations!). [0] The bulk of it is based upon George
> Kadianaki
Hi,
Today we are releasing a new, beta version of Tor Messenger, based on
Instantbird [0], an instant messaging client developed in the Mozilla
community.
* What is it?
Tor Messenger is a cross-platform chat program that aims to be secure by
default and sends all of its traffic over Tor. It sup
Hello,
For your reviewing pleasure, may I present you with a new (draft) proposal for
a new entry guard selection algorithm, and associated data structures (with
reference implementations!). [0] The bulk of it is based upon George
Kadianakis' recent email and pseudocode. [1] [2] There are still
[Here's a new proposal from Andrea. See ticket 4581 for
implementation details.]
Filename: 258-dirauth-dos.txt
Title: Denial-of-service resistance for directory authorities
Author: Andrea Shepard
Created: 2015-10-27
Status: Open
1. Problem statement
The directory authorities are few in numb
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:27:53 -0400
Nathan Freitas wrote:
> Any small or big changes to highlight that push us to the more
> accessible goal?
Well, it emphasizes that it's generic, gives a better view of the
architecture, and should be usable by anyone competent (unless my
rewrite is bad) to add
Excellent work on the rewrite. To summarize for those that do not have time
to read the whole document, it's the same spec, it's just been rewritten to
read more clearly. I think it's a great improvement over the previous
version.
I have two suggestions:
Section 4, "Tor Configuration", I think sh
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 09:19 AM, Yawning Angel wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> In an attempt to make Pluggable Transports more accessible to other
> people, and to have a spec that is more applicable and useful to other
> projects that seek to use Pluggable Transports for circumvention, I have
> drafted
Hi,
A commendable effort. It is both deserved and pleasant
that Tor hold the "gold standard" for a low latency, privacy
enhancing, distributed, collaborative network. A perhaps
more crowning achievement could be the fostering of a
diverse ecosystem of related technologies.
This effort continue
teor writes:
>> On 29 Oct 2015, at 05:26, David Goulet wrote:
>>
>> Finally, we would like your opinion also on if we should keep the
>> conflict mechanism or not?. Since those partition attacks are basically
>> dumb, do not achive much result for an attacker and it's at a high cost
>> of compr
Hello all,
In an attempt to make Pluggable Transports more accessible to other
people, and to have a spec that is more applicable and useful to other
projects that seek to use Pluggable Transports for circumvention, I have
drafted a re-write of the spec.
This is not intended to alter existing beh
11 matches
Mail list logo
