[tor-dev] List Administrivia [...encrypted onion services...]

2015-09-17 Thread grarpamp
fabio, sky, et al... Please stop top quoting massive amounts of useless text that everyone's already seen before. It's seriously annoying to peoples workflow trying to figure out what youre replying to and if youve inlined other stuff below. And it needlessly bloats peoples mailboxes and thus sear

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: End-to-end encrypted onion services for non-Tor clients

2015-09-17 Thread s7r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, I like the idea of having a secure way for the non Tor users to browse hidden service content. Given the design presented, someone who wants to do it will need to rely on third parties: domain name registers, DNS providers, hosting providers

Re: [tor-dev] Towards a new version of the PT spec...

2015-09-17 Thread Yawning Angel
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 14:28:24 -0400 Adam Pritchard wrote: > At Psiphon we often discuss (and get asked about) using Tor's > pluggable transports directly. The cost/benefit balance hasn't yet > been in favour of doing this, but if there's discussion of a big PT > revamp... maybe Psiphon should indic

Re: [tor-dev] Towards a new version of the PT spec...

2015-09-17 Thread Adam Pritchard
At Psiphon we often discuss (and get asked about) using Tor's pluggable transports directly. The cost/benefit balance hasn't yet been in favour of doing this, but if there's discussion of a big PT revamp... maybe Psiphon should indicate how the cost side of the balance could come down for us. We'r