Re: [tor-dev] Reproducibility of Pluggable Transports python.msi

2015-09-06 Thread Jeremy Rand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 09/07/2015 12:29 AM, David Fifield wrote: > Way way back when pluggable transports were first integrated into > Tor Browser, we tried compiling Python and it was too problematic > to be worth it. Here is the comment you want to read: > > https://

Re: [tor-dev] Reproducibility of Pluggable Transports python.msi

2015-09-06 Thread David Fifield
On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 11:26:16PM +, Jeremy Rand wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > I was looking at the Gitian descriptor for the pluggable transports at > https://gitweb.torproject.org/builders/tor-browser-bundle.git/tree/gitia > n/descriptors/windows/gitian-plug

[tor-dev] Reproducibility of Pluggable Transports python.msi

2015-09-06 Thread Jeremy Rand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I was looking at the Gitian descriptor for the pluggable transports at https://gitweb.torproject.org/builders/tor-browser-bundle.git/tree/gitia n/descriptors/windows/gitian-pluggable-transports.yml , and I noticed that it has an input file called "py

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal: Single onion services

2015-09-06 Thread David Goulet
On 05 Sep (14:47:41), Mike Perry wrote: > Yawning Angel: > > On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 15:31:15 -0600 > > John Brooks wrote: > > > > > > Have you considered all the implications? > > > > > > Maybe we’ve missed some - what implications are you thinking of, that > > > aren’t addressed in the proposal? >