George Kadianakis:
> Hello there,
>
> recently we've been busy specifying various important improvements to entry
> guard security. For instance see proposals 250, 241 and ticket #16861.
>
> Unfortunately, the current guard codebase is dusty and full of problems (see
> #12466, #12450). We believe
tordev...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> > > I'm not talking about those providers hosting exit nodes. I'm
> > > talking about general web sites and resources hosted by them and
> > > the traffic that goes there.
> >
> > I'm confused. You're worried about people hosting clearnet websites
> > with cloud hos
From: Sharif Olorin
To: tor-dev
Subject: Re: [tor-dev] Should cloud-hosted relays be rejected?
Date: Wed, 02 Sep 2015 08:32:58 +
> > I'm not talking about those providers hosting exit nodes. I'm talking about
> > general web sites and resources hosted by them and the traffic that goes
> >
> I'm not talking about those providers hosting exit nodes. I'm talking about
> general web sites and resources hosted by them and the traffic that goes
> there.
I'm confused. You're worried about people hosting clearnet websites
with cloud hosting providers? Or non-exit relays?
Sharif
--
Ope
From: nusenu
To: tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-dev] Should cloud-hosted relays be rejected?
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2015 19:23:35 +0200
> > It has other benefits. Those big providers see a huge amount of exit
> > traffic and can potentially do correlation against that.
>
> I disagree on
