Mansour Moufid wrote:
> Michael McConville wrote:
> > free() is specified to be NULL-safe, and I don't know of any
> > implementations that violate this.
>
> I think those NULL checks are meant to avoid double-free bugs. If you
> assign NULL to a pointer after you free it and check all pointers
>
free() is specified to be NULL-safe, and I don't know of any
implementations that violate this. Tor's *_free() functions conform,
although relaycache_free() prints a warning (which I remove in the below
diff).
I checked every *_free() function for NULL-safety before removing
conditions for it. Thi
I came across this thread from the weekly news post for this week, so
please excuse me if I've missed some from just skimming through the posts.
Having randomart/gravatars/poems/etc seems like a rather interesting
topic, but seriously adding it to tor, there seems to be a few problems
in my mind:
Hello all,
This is my seventh, and final biweekly status report for my hidden
service scaling / load-balancing SoP project.
Since my last status report:
* I have been revising my patch for #14846 with the aim of getting it
merged before the 0.2.7 feature freeze.
* I've been working with Ivan Ma