people wrote:
> And just where exactly and in what protocols and apps are
> going to build in that feedback popup... browsers? ssh? MUA? ping? skype?
> Vanity addresses encourage people to only verify the human-readable part
> That said, if an address is completely incapable, even hostile to vali
> On 13 Aug 2015, at 18:50, Nick Mathewson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 5:34 PM, nusenu wrote:
>> from today's measurement meeting:
>>
>>> 15:00:20 karsten: I've decided I'm going to fix the definition of
>>> median
>>> 15:00:26 in the tor sourcecode
>>> 15:00:36 virgil: is it broken
> On 14 Aug 2015, at 03:10 , nusenu wrote:
>
>> Changing the code to return the mean of the two center elements from
>> even arrays would break all authority voting, and wouldn't actually be
>> useful.
>
> Yes, that is what Sebastian said on IRC as well. Can you shed some light
> as to why it w
> Changing the code to return the mean of the two center elements from
> even arrays would break all authority voting, and wouldn't actually be
> useful.
Yes, that is what Sebastian said on IRC as well. Can you shed some light
as to why it would break voting?
thanks
signature.asc
Description:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 5:34 PM, nusenu wrote:
> from today's measurement meeting:
>
>> 15:00:20 karsten: I've decided I'm going to fix the definition of
>> median
>> 15:00:26 in the tor sourcecode
>> 15:00:36 virgil: is it broken?
>> 15:00:53 or just not specified as clearly as it should be?
Dear Aaon Gallagher,
Thanks for the helpful observation. i'm going to make the correction
soon and then we'll be underscore free.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Aaron Gallagher <_...@habnab.it> wrote:
> David Stainton writes:
>
>> If I get rid of this last terrible import:
>> from twisted.web.
