On 7/24/15, Yawning Angel wrote:
> ...
> I have less objections towards people using tor-fw-helper for bridges
> than for something like flashproxy or full fledged relays.
> ...
> IMO similar to relays with insufficient bandwidth, relays that can't
> connect to any other relay on demand as require
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015 16:21:31 +
Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
[snip]
> > At this point with all the resources available, I will guess that if
> > the user needs something like tor-fw-helper, they probably have no
> > idea what router firmware is.
> >
>
> Right - but why should they need to know? The
On 7/24/15, Yawning Angel wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 23:46:26 +
> Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> > Do users know that their router's implementation of NAT-PMP/uPnP is
>> > shit?
>>
>> Who knows better than the user? And who better than the user to take
>> an action and to learn it?
>
On 7/23/15, David Stainton wrote:
>> Why are we avoiding allowing users to make this choice because of the
>> above reasons? If a user wants to run a relay or a bridge, we should
>> make it easy. We don't answer the above questions when it is hard -
>> are we really off the hook there? It just see
