On Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:38:00 -0400
Nick Mathewson wrote:
> Yawning's mail below reminds me: I am considering removing the C
> implementation of tor-fw-helper from the tor distribution, and
> recommending Yawning's pure-Go implementation instead. But before I
> do this, I'd like to get some sense
Yawning's mail below reminds me: I am considering removing the C
implementation of tor-fw-helper from the tor distribution, and recommending
Yawning's pure-Go implementation instead. But before I do this, I'd like
to get some sense of whether folks are shipping tor-fw-helper today, or
using it in
On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 01:06:41 +1000
teor wrote:
>
> > On 20 Jul 2015, at 11:11 , Serg wrote:
> >
> >> How do you plan to map ports on NAT devices?
> >
> > If it can't be done automatically using UPnP, This must be done
> > manually. No alternative cases.
>
> Our experience is that most router
> On 20 Jul 2015, at 11:11 , Serg wrote:
>
>> How do you plan to map ports on NAT devices?
>
> If it can't be done automatically using UPnP, This must be done manually. No
> alternative cases.
Our experience is that most routers' UPnP / NAT-PMP implementations don't work
well with (our) auto
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[I hope this message is not considered noise by people on this list,
but we haven't yet decided where these announcements should be sent.
Until we have, I'm planning to send these messages to this list and
tag them with [Measurement Team], so that peop
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 06:31:41AM +, isis wrote:
> Thanks for the heads up! I've added unittests to BridgeDB to test how its
> parsers handle the HSDir flag (and make-believe flags like "Unicorn" for good
> measure). [0]
Great.
> Does this mean that, if I were a client using Bridges, and I
