Re: [tor-dev] The future of GetTor

2015-06-18 Thread ilv
Hi Adam, On 18/06/15 16:40, Adam Pritchard wrote: >> >> I'm currently the maintainer of GetTor [1], and together with Nima and >> Sukhbir we have been talking about the future of it. > > > If this conversation moves elsewhere, I would really like to be kept in the > loop. > Good, I'll create a

Re: [tor-dev] The future of GetTor

2015-06-18 Thread ilv
Hi, > > The distributor sounds like a great idea, but, with Option 2, the user should > always be able to fall back to actual links to the cloud services (wherever > possible). This allows users who have trouble with the automated download to > retry later, perhaps at a different location, or

Re: [tor-dev] The future of GetTor

2015-06-18 Thread ilv
Hi Griffin, On 16/06/15 05:54, Griffin Boyce wrote: > > While I don't necessarily want to discourage you from working on > GetTor, it's worth noting the duplicated effort in terms of distribution > apps. My primary project makes downloading Tor (and other privacy > software) from un-censored s

Re: [tor-dev] The future of GetTor

2015-06-18 Thread ilv
On 16/06/15 05:15, intrigeri wrote: > Hi, > Hi, > > You might be interested in the work that's happening there: > https://tails.boum.org/blueprint/bootstrapping/extension/ > > (I'm not directly involved in this, for more information ask > sajol...@pimienta.org.) > This looks great, thanks f

Re: [tor-dev] The future of GetTor

2015-06-18 Thread Adam Pritchard
> > I'm currently the maintainer of GetTor [1], and together with Nima and > Sukhbir we have been talking about the future of it. If this conversation moves elsewhere, I would really like to be kept in the loop. I'm the primary maintainer of Psiphon's email auto-responder, which was initially mo