On 05/26/2015 07:08 AM, Paul Syverson wrote:
> Safe data gathering nonwithstanding, it would be interesting if there
> were actually diagnostic or other information that became salient when
> rendered in an auditory modality: higher fraction of highly
> interactive (e.g. IRC) traffic?, sudden DD
On the browser side, while waiting for vendor updates, Mozilla released
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/disable-dhe/ which does
something very similar to
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/strict-ssl3-configuration/
(shameless plug) which disables broken or weak ciphe
I posted this on a blog comment, but others may be interested too.
As near as I can tell, the "logjam"/"weakdh" attacks should not affect
current Tor software very much, for a few reasons:
* All currently supported Tor versions, when built with OpenSSL 1.0 or
later, prefer 256-bit elliptic
On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 04:33:39PM -0600, Kenneth Freeman wrote:
>
>
> On 05/22/2015 04:27 PM, l.m wrote:
> >
> > So...wouldn't the torified traffic sound like...white noise? I can
> > fall asleep to that.
>
> In and of itself a sufficient condition.
>
Safe data gathering nonwithstanding, it
