On Sunday 24 May 2015 18:41:33 Zack Weinberg wrote:
> I see -std=c99 in there, not -std=gnu99.
> If -std=gnu99 does not work, try adding -D_GNU_SOURCE=1 or
> -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700. If neither of those work, root around in
> uClibc's header files for other macros named _SOMETHING_SOURCE to try.
Ah,
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Lars Boegild Thomsen
wrote:
> On Sunday 24 May 2015 20:32:41 Ondrej Mikle wrote:
>> There is also patchless way by adding "-std=gnu99" to CFLAGS (aside from C99
>> it
>> enables GNU extensions needed for compiling against uClibc on OpenWrt).
>
> Read my first mess
On 05/25/2015 12:32 AM, Lars Boegild Thomsen wrote:
> On Sunday 24 May 2015 20:32:41 Ondrej Mikle wrote:
>> There is also patchless way by adding "-std=gnu99" to CFLAGS (aside from C99
>> it
>> enables GNU extensions needed for compiling against uClibc on OpenWrt).
>
> Read my first message with
On Sunday 24 May 2015 20:32:41 Ondrej Mikle wrote:
> There is also patchless way by adding "-std=gnu99" to CFLAGS (aside from C99
> it
> enables GNU extensions needed for compiling against uClibc on OpenWrt).
Read my first message with this topic. That was my very first attempt.
Unfortunately
On Sun, May 24, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Ondrej Mikle wrote:
> On 05/24/2015 05:19 AM, Lars Boegild Thomsen wrote:
>> On Friday 22 May 2015 09:20:29 Shawn Nock wrote:
>>> Will you post the Makefile for the buildroot package?
>>
>> Sorry guys, I sorted this one out. The culprit was actually my added
>> -
On 05/24/2015 05:19 AM, Lars Boegild Thomsen wrote:
> On Friday 22 May 2015 09:20:29 Shawn Nock wrote:
>> Will you post the Makefile for the buildroot package?
>
> Sorry guys, I sorted this one out. The culprit was actually my added
> -std=c99 that made lots of other stuff break. Taking that ou
John Brooks writes:
> It occurred to me that with proposal 224, there’s no longer a clear reason
> to use both HSDirs and introduction points. I think we could select the IP
> in the same way that we plan to select HSDirs, and bypass needing
> descriptors entirely.
>
> Imagine that we select a se
Jeff Burdges writes:
> On 12 May 2015, at 10:39, Michael Rogers wrote:
>> Something like this was suggested last May, and a concern was raised
>> about a malicious IP repeatedly killing the long-term circuit in order
>> to cause the HS to rebuild it. If the HS were ever to rebuild the
>> circuit
